AccessISL Poster: UW 2020 Teaching and Learning Symposium
View the PDF above to download a poster that describes the questions, methods, and results from work done towards accessible and equitable informal STEM learning by AccessISL. Below is the HTML content of the PDF poster. You can also watch a video presentation of this poster intended for the UW 2020 Teaching and Learning Symposium.
Scott Bellman, Program Manager, UW Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, & Technology (DO-IT)
Sheryl Burgstahler, Ph.D., Director, UW Accessible Technology Services
Meena Selvakumar, Ph.D., Lecturer, UW Information School
Victoria Bonebrake, Graduate Student, UW Museology Program
As increasing numbers of people with disabilities participate in academic opportunities and careers, the accessibility of classes, services, electronic resources, and events—as well as informal STEM learning (ISL) activities—increases in importance. The goal is simply equal access; everyone who would like to engage in informal STEM learning should be able to do so comfortably and efficiently.
What factors contribute to accessible and equitable ISL? Which stakeholders can contribute to making ISL more accessible to individuals with disabilities?
Review of research and practice literature underscores the importance of applying universal design (UD) concepts in education settings, including informal STEM education. UD is defined as “the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design.”
In pilot activities*, 46 students with a wide variety of disabilities from 13 high schools and 16 postsecondary institutions contributed a total of 79 accessibility reviews of ISL programs including the Seattle Aquarium, the Pacific Science Center, Museum of Flight, Burke Museum, and the Woodland Park Zoo.
Students with disabilities increased their awareness of access issues related to ISL offerings, access solutions, and advocacy strategies. ISL educators learned more about accessible offerings and gained further appreciation of the talents and perspectives of students with disabilities. A follow-up project, AccessISL, was funded by the National Science Foundation.
AccessISL supports efforts to develop a capacity building model for making ISL opportunities more welcoming and accessible to everyone. AccessISL offers engagement that will empower STEM students with disabilities and museology students and bring together three groups of professionals—those who offer ISL programs, those who train future ISL professionals, and those who specialize in access issues for individuals with disabilities—to work toward more inclusive ISL programs in our communities.
*Crawford, L., & Burgstahler, S. (2013). Promoting the design of accessible informal science learning. In S. Burgstahler (Ed.), Universal design in higher education: Promising practices. Seattle: DO-IT, University of Washington. Retrieved from www.washington.edu/doit/promoting-design-accessible-informal-science-learning
Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice Second Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Visit the AccessISL website to learn more about consultation and other opportunities such as:
- Engagement of Students: Participating students promote accessible ISL as they develop leadership skills, complete projects, and engage with mentors.
- Online Community of Practice: Staff and administrators of ISL programs, instructors, students, individuals with disabilities, and other stakeholders discuss strategies and share resources for promoting accessible ISL.
- Capacity Building Institute: An institute will include information sessions, panel presentations, and group discussions to identify systemic changes for making ISL programs more welcoming and accessible.
Authors would like to thank faculty, students, and staff of the UW Museology Program, AccessISL interns, and the staff and students of the UW DO-IT Center.
AccessISL is funded by the National Science Foundation (grant #DRL-1906147). Any questions, findings, and conclusions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the federal government.